TRIGGON Open in Telegram
About Triggon

We built the platform we needed back when we were the ones losing money.

Triggon is made by five friends living in five different places: two software engineers, a data scientist, a professional trader, and a manager who came to this from a doctorate in business administration. Long before any of us thought about building a platform, we were simply trading, here and there, and we were losing money doing it.

We tried the things everyone recommends

Different strategies. Different methods. Signal channels. Trading packages. The advice that circulates endlessly in Discord servers, Telegram groups and every other trading community we were part of.

None of it worked for us with any consistency. Some of it worked once. Some of it worked while the market happened to be doing the thing it was built for, and then stopped. What we could never do, with any of it, was tell the difference between the two while it was happening, because we were never shown enough to tell.

We are not saying nobody out there can trade. Plenty of people can. We are saying that from where we were standing, as the people paying for it, there was no way to know which was which before the money was already gone.

At some point we stopped looking for a better answer

Instead of following the same rules everybody seemed to teach, we started developing our own strategies.

The important thing at that stage was not making anything sound sophisticated. It was clarity. We wanted to understand what was actually happening: what worked, what did not, and why. That meant writing things down before we knew how they would turn out, keeping the losses in the file next to the wins, and being willing to read the result honestly afterwards.

It is a slower way to work, and it is much less flattering. It is also the only thing that ever taught us anything.

That habit is the whole product. Nearly every rule Triggon runs on came out of this period, before there was any thought of a company. A trade is written down when it opens, not when it closes. A losing month stays visible. A figure is computed from the record rather than reported by the person it describes.

Why we did not stop at a signal channel

The first idea was much smaller than what exists now. We were going to open a channel and share the strategies we had developed.

The question

Why stop at a signal channel?

A channel would have solved the problem for the few hundred people who found ours. It would have done nothing about the reason we needed it in the first place, and anyone joining would have had to take our word for our results, exactly as we had been asked to take everyone else's.

The answer

Build the culture, not the channel

The thing worth building was not another set of signals. It was a place where clarity and honesty are how the system works rather than a promise somebody makes, and where that applies to every Provider on it, including us.

What we kept running into

Numbers with no record behind themA published history we had no way to check against the trades it claimed to describe.
No way to tell selection from completenessA run of wins and a run of wins with the losses omitted look the same from outside, and nothing published resolves which one you are reading.
Screenshots offered as evidenceA picture of a balance, taken afterwards, from a system nobody else can open. It may be entirely accurate; it still establishes nothing about how the balance got there.
Performance without contextAn impressive figure shown with no drawdown beside it, no trade count, no period, and no way to ask what actually happened.

None of this is unusual, and most of it is not even dishonest by intent. It is simply what happens in a market where the person publishing the results is also the only person who holds them. We wanted to build something where that is not the arrangement.

So this is what Triggon is for

Three things, and everything else on the platform is downstream of them.

  1. Performance that is presented clearly. Return next to drawdown, the trade count next to the period, the win rate next to the profit factor. A figure with nothing beside it is half a sentence, and we stopped accepting half sentences a long time before we built this. How each figure is computed →
  2. Results that can be verified. Every trade enters a Strategy's record the moment its Signal fires, which is also the moment it reaches the people following it. Nothing can be added later and nothing can be removed, so the history is written against the future rather than assembled from the past. What we check, and what we do not →
  3. A history you can read, rather than a claim you are asked to believe. Open any Strategy and go through every position it has taken, in order, with the losses in place, before you decide anything and without paying for the privilege. Read a Provider's journal →

The five of us

A small team in several countries and several time zones, which turns out to suit a product whose markets never all close at once.

Two software engineersThe platform itself: the recording, the delivery, the execution path and everything that has to stay correct while it runs.
A data scientistHow performance is measured, how the Triggon Score is built, and where a statistic stops being able to support the weight put on it.
A professional traderWhether a rule survives contact with a real market, and whether what we publish is what a trader actually needs to see.
A managerHolding the work to a standard from a background in business administration, at doctorate level, and keeping it aimed at people rather than at features.
This page is a story, and a story is not evidence. Nothing here should be a reason to trust a Strategy. The reason to trust a Strategy is its record, and every one of them is open before you pay anything.

Read a record, not a promise.

The fastest way to understand what we built is to open a Strategy and go through its whole history, losses included, the way we wish we could have done years ago.